Contact

September 30th Interim Final Rule Brings Clarity to the Arbitration Process

The 2nd Interim Final Rule for the No Surprises Act clarifies the arbitration process and the importance of the QPA.

October 14, 2021 |
Two clients sitting at arbitration with arbiter pointing at paperwork

On September 30, 2021 an interim final rule (IFR) titled “Requirements Related to Surprise Billing: Part II” was released. Among other things, this IFR helps to clarify the independent dispute resolution process, and in doing so, clarifies the role of the qualifying payment amount (QPA).

Initiating Arbitration
The rule states that disputing parties must participate in a 30 business day open negotiation period to determine a payment amount. If at the end of the 30 business days the parties have failed to reach an agreement, either may initiate the independent dispute resolution process. The process must be initiated within four business days of the expiration of the 30 business day negotiation period.  

The first step of the arbitration process is selecting a certified independent dispute resolution entity:

  • The IDR entity must attest that they do not have a conflict of interest with either the payor or provider.
  • The IDR entity must be accredited by a nationally recognized and relevant accreditation organization, such as URAC , or ensure that its personnel otherwise possess the requisite training to conduct payment determinations

 

The parties can jointly choose the IDR entity. If they can’t agree on one, an IDR entity will be assigned.

The Arbitration Process
Once the IDR entity is selected, both parties have ten business days to submit their payment offers and supporting documentation. The IDR entity will then select one of the offers submitted. The IDR entity’s decision is binding, and payment must be made within 30 calendar days of the decision.

The Importance of QPA
The September 30th IFR establishes that when deciding on a payment amount, the IDR entity begins with the assumption that the QPA is the appropriate out-of-network amount.  The IDR entity will typically choose the offer closest to the QPA, but each party can submit information that clearly demonstrates the value of the item or service is different from the QPA.

 

The information provided on this website does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice; instead, all information, content, and materials available on this site are for general informational purposes. If you have questions about how the No Surprises Act applies to your organization, please consult your legal counsel.

This post was updated on November 12, 2021.

Engaging insights.

New ideas, proven best practices, and fresh perspectives for the healthcare ecosystem.

  • Your team is great at building trust. I have had nothing but a positive and efficient experience.

    Manager

    Large Midwest health plan

  • These are really important things that we wouldn’t be able to do without a partner like Claritev because, again, we want to look at this stuff holistically across carriers. It would take me four times as long to go into every health plan and do this kind of analysis.

    Executive Vice President

    Large, regional consulting firm/insurance brokerage

  • They (Claritev) are continuously refining and developing the platform to meet my needs.

    A Major Healthcare Provider

  • The Technology Leadership Program has brought my department tremendous value. The well-structured program offers the talented hardworking associates options for their career paths, yet exposes them to high visibility initiatives. Every associate has brought a unique perspective and strong professional skills to the organization.

    Bobby Vincent

    Senior Information Technology Director

  • The Technology Leadership Program associates have a tremendous opportunity before them. To have three years to rotate through various departments within Information Technology before deciding which role/area suits them best.  Depending on their choice and interest, they become a unique blend of technologist, business expert and, eventually, corporate leader.

    Andrew George

    Senior Vice President, Information Technology

  • One of the great successes of the program has been our ability to identify and develop emerging leaders whom contribute in every facet of our business. It hasn’t been just about growing IT leaders, it’s about maturing business leaders for Claritev.

    Ed Ververs

    Senior Director, Telecom & Data Center Management

  • I had the privilege to mentor some of the Technology Leadership Program participants and was fortunate to absorb a member into my team, where he has helped tremendously with new automation techniques. Participants bring in fresh perspectives and extreme enthusiasm to IT here at Claritev. I’m looking forward to adding more.

    Vasu Raghunathan

    Senior Director of Data & Service Delivery

  • You have been a great partner from day one. You collaborate with us until we find a resolution. We look forward to a long-standing partnership.

    Payment Integrity and Performance Manager

  • The things we value most about our partnership with Claritev are not just the reliable, efficient delivery of savings through their MSP and ESRD services, but the fact that they are always willing to come to the table to discuss and collaborate on new and innovative solutions that nobody else in the industry has yet to try.

    Drew Satriano, VP of Payment Integrity

    Highmark, Inc.

  • In our experience, Claritev has been very responsive with great turnaround times and the findings they’ve presented to SIHO have been accurate and reasonable.

    Claims Department

    SIHO Insurance Services, Inc.

Pattern


Seeking clarity to inform your complex decisions?

Learn how Claritev delivers the objective, market-driven insight you need to make the most complex decisions.

Start The Conversation