How the No Surprises Act Changes Reimbursement

The No Surprises Act (NSA), effective January 1, 2022, changes the reimbursement process for claims identified as surprise bills. Claritev explains how.

Medical billing statement on a table with stethoscope and tablet
 

The No Surprises Act (NSA), effective January 1, 2022, changes the reimbursement process for claims identified as surprise bills. While the reimbursement process begins the same way it does for other claims with the provider sending the bill to the health plan for adjudication, the similarities end there. The NSA prohibits members from being balance billed when they inadvertently receive out-of-network care. It doesn’t prescribe the amount that must be paid to the provider, but it does outline how the member’s and payor’s shares of the payment are determined. Here are three key terms you need to know.

 

The Recognized Amount

According to the NSA, the member’s share must be based on what the new law calls the Recognized Amount (RA), which may or may not be the claim’s allowed amount. The member’s share is determined before the claim is paid, and it can’t be changed even if the plan ends up paying a higher amount. For most ERISA plans, the RA is the lesser of billed charges or the Qualifying Payment Amount described below. For insured claims regulated under state surprise bill laws or All-Payer Model Agreements, or ERISA plans that have opted in to such laws, the RA may be determined by the state law.

 

The Qualifying Payment Amount

While the NSA doesn’t dictate the amount the plan pays the provider, it does establish an important benchmark, the Qualifying Payment Amount (QPA), which is the median contract rate for the plan as of January 31, 2019, adjusted for urban market CPI (CPI-U). In addition to serving as the RA for ERISA and select insured plans when less than billed charges, the QPA is a required value considered during the Independent Dispute Resolution process described below.

 

The Out-of-Network Rate

The total amount the plan pays the provider is called the Out-of-Network Rate. It is determined in one of three potential steps. The first step is the initial payment amount. The plan receives the bill and makes an initial payment. This is an amount the payor believes to be an appropriate full reimbursement amount. If the provider accepts that payment, it becomes the Out-Of-Network Rate for this claim, and the reimbursement process is complete.

Open Negotiation is the second possible step. It occurs if the provider doesn’t accept the payor’s initial payment. The plan and provider have 30 business days to negotiate a settlement. If the negotiation is successful, the negotiated amount becomes the Out-Of-Network Rate. If the parties don’t come to an agreement, the process moves to the third potential step, Independent Dispute Resolution (IDR). If reimbursement reaches the third step, both the payor and the provider submit a final offer amount for consideration by a Certified IDR Entity, who will choose one of the two amounts. Typically, the IDR Entity is expected to select the offer that is closest to the QPA for the claim, but either party may submit information supporting the position that the QPA is or is not the appropriate reimbursement in this instance.

 

Learn how Claritev’s Surprise Billing Service can help you comply with requirements of the No Surprises Act.

 

The information provided on this website does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice; instead, all information, content, and materials available on this site are for general informational purposes. If you have questions about how the No Surprises Act applies to your organization, please consult your legal counsel.

Engaging insights.

New ideas, proven best practices, and fresh perspectives for the healthcare ecosystem.

  • Your team is great at building trust. I have had nothing but a positive and efficient experience.

    Manager

    Large Midwest health plan

  • These are really important things that we wouldn’t be able to do without a partner like Claritev because, again, we want to look at this stuff holistically across carriers. It would take me four times as long to go into every health plan and do this kind of analysis.

    Executive Vice President

    Large, regional consulting firm/insurance brokerage

  • They (Claritev) are continuously refining and developing the platform to meet my needs.

    A Major Healthcare Provider

  • The Technology Leadership Program has brought my department tremendous value. The well-structured program offers the talented hardworking associates options for their career paths, yet exposes them to high visibility initiatives. Every associate has brought a unique perspective and strong professional skills to the organization.

    Bobby Vincent

    Senior Information Technology Director

  • The Technology Leadership Program associates have a tremendous opportunity before them. To have three years to rotate through various departments within Information Technology before deciding which role/area suits them best.  Depending on their choice and interest, they become a unique blend of technologist, business expert and, eventually, corporate leader.

    Andrew George

    Senior Vice President, Information Technology

  • One of the great successes of the program has been our ability to identify and develop emerging leaders whom contribute in every facet of our business. It hasn’t been just about growing IT leaders, it’s about maturing business leaders for Claritev.

    Ed Ververs

    Senior Director, Telecom & Data Center Management

  • I had the privilege to mentor some of the Technology Leadership Program participants and was fortunate to absorb a member into my team, where he has helped tremendously with new automation techniques. Participants bring in fresh perspectives and extreme enthusiasm to IT here at Claritev. I’m looking forward to adding more.

    Vasu Raghunathan

    Senior Director of Data & Service Delivery

  • You have been a great partner from day one. You collaborate with us until we find a resolution. We look forward to a long-standing partnership.

    Payment Integrity and Performance Manager

  • The things we value most about our partnership with Claritev are not just the reliable, efficient delivery of savings through their MSP and ESRD services, but the fact that they are always willing to come to the table to discuss and collaborate on new and innovative solutions that nobody else in the industry has yet to try.

    Drew Satriano, VP of Payment Integrity

    Highmark, Inc.

  • In our experience, Claritev has been very responsive with great turnaround times and the findings they’ve presented to SIHO have been accurate and reasonable.

    Claims Department

    SIHO Insurance Services, Inc.

Pattern

Learn how Claritev delivers the objective, market-driven insight you need to make the most complex decisions.